Rovaha Rovaha
Rovaha Rovaha
  • Home
  • Branding
    • Corporate branding
    • Brand integration
  • Customer satisfaction
    • Customer satisfaction models
    • Customer Satisfaction Questionnaire
  • Strategy
    • Strategy model
  • Communication
    • Rose of Leary
    • M&A: The role of Marketing
  • Multi media
    • Presentations
  • Loudspeaker design
    • SEAS Jenzen Next
      • Intro - SEAS Jenzen Next
      • Drawings
      • Image library
    • Vifa Format
      • Intro - how it all started
      • Drawings
      • Image library
  1. You are here:  
  2. Home
  3. Customer satisfaction
  4. Customer satisfaction models
  5. Four types of value
Details
Ronald van Haaften By Ronald van Haaften
Ronald van Haaften

2.1.5.1 Four types of value

Woodall (2003) reviewed the extensive literature on perceived value, or as he calls it ‘value for the customer.’ He used a historical perspective to describe how value has been treated in the fields of economics and philosophy. He distinguished four types of value;

  1. Intrinsic value,
  2. Exchange value,
  3. Use value,
  4. Utilitarian value.

Based on whether the value assessment is subject-based or object-based (i.e. individual vs. collective), and on whether value should be seen in light of market characteristics and/or consumer sacrifices.

Intrinsic value

Intrinsic value refers to the objective-based value that resides within the product, independent from market circumstances. This objective value assessment is made when people analyze the intrinsic product characteristics before, or during use. In this respect, Frondizi (1971) argued that all objects have ‘qualities’ but if a quality is not valued, then it remains a quality. If it is valued, then it becomes an intrinsic value.

Exchange value

Exchange value is also object-based, but influenced by market circumstances. For example, people attribute value to oil through an economic constant, which largely depends on the market circumstances (e.g. scarcity).

Use value

Use value is subjective-based and is perceived as individuals evaluate the product during, or just after use. It is associated with the rewards persons individually derive from using the product, and is thus highly subjective.

Utilitarian value

Finally, utilitarian value is also subject-based, but now refers to the point when intrinsic value and/or use value are compared with the sacrifice the person made in order to experience those forms of value. According to Woodall (2003), the utilitarian approach is to balance ‘all the good and the bad.’ Here value is seen as the outcome of a personal comparison of sacrifices and benefits, an outcome that is essentially utilitarian in nature. The utilitarian approach assumes that the value derived by one individual is likely to be different from the value derived by another, because of the personal attribution of value. Value is here solely determined by the individual consumer (Woodruff 1997; Holbrook 1999), and only exists on the consumers’ terms (Piercy 1997).

Figure 7 shows Woodall’s (2003) conceptual model, which represents the different types of values and the impact of human values on these types of value. It is assumed that human values (e.g. quality of life, belongingness) guide consumers in their daily decision making by affecting the criteria by which value judgments are made. As such, human values are seen as influencers of value (Woodall 2003). The four types of value illustrate the diversity in meanings of value, and the difficulty of conceptualizing the concept of value (cf. Zeithaml 1988). Woodall complicates the issue of what constitutes value by arguing that “value is neither use, nor exchange; it is neither object-based, nor subject-based; it is neither my view, nor your view, it is all of these things.” He proposes that the types of value may play a more (less) substantial role in the formation of value, according to the situation itself and the individual consumer’s value system.

Intrinsic, exchange, use and utilitarian value

Figure 7 Intrinsic, exchange, use and utilitarian value.

Previous article: Customer expectations and perceived value Prev Next article: Definitions of perceived value Next

About the website

The Rovaha website is here to provide information and serve as a helpful resource, but it’s not meant to replace professional advice. It's designed to be a convenient and accessible space for visitors like you.

Thank you for visiting, and we hope you find value in what we share!

Ronald van Haaften at LinkedIn

Welcome to my professional LinkedIn


Who is online

We have 72 guests and no members online

(C) Rovaha 2024 | Ronald van Haaften

The Rovaha website is here to provide information and serve as a helpful resource, but it’s not meant to replace professional advice. It's designed to be a convenient and accessible space for visitors like you.

By exploring or using this non-commercial site, you agree to the terms and conditions, copyright notices, and privacy and cookie policies outlined here. Your continued use of the site means you accept these terms and agree to follow them. If these terms don’t work for you, we kindly ask that you stop using the website.

Thank you for visiting, and we hope you find value in what we share!

  • About this website
    • Privacy and Cookie Policy
    • Copyright notice
    • Term of Use
Cookies user preferences
We use cookies to ensure you to get the best experience on our website. If you decline the use of cookies, this website may not function as expected.
Accept all
Decline all
Read more
Unknown
Unknown
Accept
Decline
Analytics
Tools used to analyze the data to measure the effectiveness of a website and to understand how it works.
Google Analytics
Accept
Decline
Google Analytics
Accept
Decline
Advertisement
If you accept, the ads on the page will be adapted to your preferences.
Google Ad
Accept
Decline
Save